Non-opioid analgesic combinations following total hip arthroplasty (RECIPE): a randomised, placebo-controlled, blinded, multicentre trial.

BACKGROUND: Multimodal postoperative analgesia following total hip arthroplasty is recommended, but the optimal combination of drugs remains uncertain. The aim of the RECIPE trial was to investigate the relative benefit and harm of the different combinations of paracetamol, ibuprofen, and the analgesic adjuvant dexamethasone for treatment of postoperative pain following total hip arthroplasty. METHODS: The RECIPE trial was a randomised, blinded, placebo-controlled trial conducted at nine Danish hospitals. Adults scheduled for total hip arthroplasty were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) using a computer-generated list with stratification by site to receive combinations of oral paracetamol 1000 mg every 6 h, oral ibuprofen 400 mg every 6 h, or a single-dose of intravenous dexamethasone 24 mg in the following groups: paracetamol plus ibuprofen, ibuprofen plus dexamethasone, paracetamol plus dexamethasone, and paracetamol plus ibuprofen plus dexamethasone. The primary outcome was 24 h intravenous morphine consumption, analysed in a modified intention-to-treat population, defined as all randomly assigned participants who underwent total hip arthroplasty. The predefined minimal important difference was 8 mg. Safety outcomes included serious and non-serious adverse events within 90 days and 24 h. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04123873. FINDINGS: Between March 5, 2020, and Nov 15, 2022, we randomly assigned 1060 participants, of whom 1043 (589 [56%] women and 454 [44%] men) were included in the modified intention-to-treat population. 261 were assigned to paracetamol plus ibuprofen, 262 to ibuprofen plus dexamethasone, 262 to paracetamol plus dexamethasone, and 258 to paracetamol plus ibuprofen plus dexamethasone. Median 24 h morphine consumption was 24 mg (IQR 12-38) in the paracetamol plus ibuprofen group, 20 mg (12-32) in the paracetamol plus dexamethasone group, 16 mg (10-30) in the ibuprofen plus dexamethasone group, and 15 mg (8-26) in the paracetamol plus ibuprofen plus dexamethasone group. The paracetamol plus ibuprofen plus dexamethasone group had a significantly reduced 24 h morphine consumption compared with paracetamol plus ibuprofen (Hodges-Lehmann median difference -6 mg [99% CI -10 to -3]; p<0·0001) and paracetamol plus dexamethasone (-4 mg [-8 to -1]; p=0·0013), however, none of the comparisons showed differences reaching the minimal important threshold of 8 mg. 91 (35%) of 258 participants in the paracetamol plus ibuprofen plus dexamethasone group had one or more adverse events, compared with 99 (38%) of 262 in the ibuprofen plus dexamethasone group, 103 (39%) of 262 in the paracetamol plus dexamethasone group, and 165 (63%) of 261 in the paracetamol plus ibuprofen group. INTERPRETATION: In adults undergoing total hip arthroplasty, a combination of paracetamol, ibuprofen, and dexamethasone had the lowest morphine consumption within 24 h following surgery and the most favourable adverse event profile, with a lower incidence of serious and non-serious adverse events (primarily driven by differences in nausea, vomiting, and dizziness) compared with paracetamol plus ibuprofen. FUNDING: The Novo Nordisk Foundation and Næstved-Slagelse-Ringsted Hospitals' Research Fund.

The presence of abdominal pain associated with acetaminophen overdose does not predict severity of liver injury.

AIM: Whilst it is known that abdominal pain is a common symptom in patients with acetaminophen overdose, its association with severity of liver injury has not been clearly defined. This study investigates the association between the symptom of abdominal pain on presentation to hospital and the degree of liver injury post-acetaminophen overdose. METHODS: Admissions with acetaminophen poisoning, requiring treatment with acetylcysteine were identified and reviewed from a search of a large Australian tertiary hospital network from February 20th, 2014, to August 30th, 2018. Parameters such as presence of abdominal pain, time post-ingestion and peak ALT were collected. Single acute ingestions, staggered and repeated supratherapeutic ingestions were analysed. RESULTS: 539 cases were identified in the study period, 79% female, with mean age 25 (17-43) years. Patients presenting to the emergency department with abdominal pain post-acetaminophen overdose had a similar risk of developing hepatotoxicity or acute liver injury compared to patients without abdominal pain regardless of time to presentation. Patients presenting <8-h post-overdose with abdominal pain were as likely to develop hepatotoxicity (1/46, 2.2%) compared to those without abdominal pain (1/54 [1.9%]; OR = 1.18 [0.07 to 19.4]). Those presenting >8-h post-overdose with abdominal pain were as likely to develop hepatotoxicity (13/92, 14.1%) compared to those without abdominal pain (4/35 [11.4%]; OR = 1.28 [0.39 to 4.21]). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of abdominal pain after acetaminophen overdose was not predictive of the development of liver injury in patients receiving acetylcysteine treatment. Further prospective studies are required to confirm this finding. The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.

Pain-related hospitalization and emergency room visit following initial analgesic prescription after outpatient surgery.

PURPOSE: Our study examined the association between outpatient postsurgical analgesic prescription and risk of insufficiently managed pain characterized by pain-associated hospital admission and emergency room (ER) visit. METHODS: Eligible individuals were children 1-17 years of age who filled an incident analgesic following an outpatient surgery during 2013-2018. Pain-associated hospital admission or ER visit were measured within 30 days following the outpatient surgical procedure. A hierarchical multivariable logistic regression model with patients nested under prescribers was fitted to test the association between incident analgesic prescription and risk of having pain-associated hospital admission or ER visit. RESULTS: Of 14 277 children meeting the inclusion criteria, 6224 (43.6%) received an incident opioid and 8053 (56.4%) received an incident non-opioid analgesic prescription respectively. There were a total of 523 (3.7%) children undergoing surgical procedures that had pain-related hospital admissions or ER visits with 5.1% initiated on non-opioid analgesics and 1.8% on opioid analgesics. The multilevel model indicated that initial opioid analgesic recipients were 32% less likely of having a pain-associated hospital admission or ER visit [aOR: 0.68 (95% CI: 0.3-0.8)]. CONCLUSION: Majority of postsurgical patients do not require additional pain management strategies. In the 3.7% of patients requiring additional pain management strategies, those initiated on non-opioid analgesics are more likely to have a pain-associated hospital admission or ER visit compared with their opioid recipient counterparts.

Comparison of intravenous ibuprofen and paracetamol for peri-operative analgesia in paediatric day care tonsillectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of intravenous ibuprofen and acetaminophen as perioperative analgesics in paediatric patients undergoing day- care tonsillectomy with general anaesthesia. METHODS: The quasi-experimental stud y was conduc ted at the Ana esthe sia D epartment of Pa k Emirates M ilitary Hospital, Rawalpindi , Pak ist an, from July 20 21 to June 2022, and comp rised paediatric pa t ients aged 5-12 yea r s undergoing day- care tonsil lec tomy with gen era l anaesthesia. The sub jec ts were divid ed into two equa l groups. Patients in Group I received intravenous ibuprofen 7mg/kg and patients in Group P received intravenous paracetamol 10mg/kg im media t ely after induction of anaesthesi a. All patients recei ved standard general anaesthesia with endotracheal intubation. The primary outcome measured was revised faces pain score immediately after recovery and at the time of discharge 6 hours later. Adverse events were also noted. Data was analysed using SPSS 26. RESULTS: Of the 100 patients, there were 50(50%) in Group I; 21(42%) boys and 29(58%) girls with mean age 7.82±1.903 years. The remaining 50(50%) subjects were in Group P; 25(50%) boys and 25(50%) girls with mean age 7.68±1.812 years. At baseline, 44(88%) patients in Group I and 42(84%) in Group P reported no pain, while 6(12%) and 8(16%) patients in the two groups, respectively, reported pain (p=0.56). At discharge, 35(70%) patients in Group I and 18(36%) in Group P reported no pain (p<0.001). Adverse events were not significantly different between the groups (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: I ntravenous ibuprofen was found to b e a superior pain-killer than intravenous paracetamol for perioperative care of paediatric patients in day- care tonsillectomy.

The association of intraoperative opioid dose with postanesthesia care unit outcomes in children: a retrospective study.

PURPOSE: In children, the relationship between the dose of intraoperative opioid and postoperative outcomes is unclear. We examined the relationship between intraoperative opioid dose and postanesthesia care unit (PACU) pain scores and opioid and antiemetic administrations. METHODS: We performed a single-institution retrospective cohort study. Patients who were aged < 19 yr, had an American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status of I-III, were undergoing one of 11 procedures under general anesthesia and without regional anesthesia, and who were admitted to the PACU were included. Patients were analyzed by quartiles of total intraoperative opioid dose using multivariable regression, adjusting for confounders including procedure. An exploratory analysis of opioid-free anesthetics was also performed. RESULTS: Three thousand, seven hundred and thirty-three cases were included, and the mean age of included patients was 8.3 yr. After adjustment, there were no significant differences between the lowest and higher quartiles for first conscious pain score, mean pain score, PACU opioid dose, or PACU length of stay; in addition, estimated differences were small. Patients in higher quartiles were estimated to be more likely to receive antiemetics, significantly so for those in the second quartile. Patients in the lowest quartile received significantly more intraoperative nonopioid analgesics. In the exploratory analysis, no significant difference in PACU pain scores was found in cases without intraoperative opioids. CONCLUSIONS: Children who received lower doses of intraoperative opioids did not have worse PACU pain outcomes but required fewer antiemetics and received greater numbers of nonopioid analgesics intraoperatively. These findings suggest that lower doses of intraoperative opioids may be administered to children as long as other analgesics are used.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Chez les enfants, la relation entre la dose peropératoire d'opioïdes et les issues postopératoires n'est pas claire. Nous avons examiné la relation entre la dose peropératoire d'opioïdes, les scores de douleur en salle de réveil, et les administrations d'opioïdes et d'antiémétiques. MéTHODE: Nous avons réalisé une étude de cohorte rétrospective dans un seul établissement. Nous avons inclus les patient·es âgé·es < 19 ans ayant un statut physique ASA de I-III et bénéficiant de l'une de 11 interventions sous anesthésie générale et sans anesthésie régionale, et qui avaient été admis·es en salle de réveil. Les patient·es ont été analysé·es par quartiles de la dose totale d'opioïdes peropératoires en utilisant une régression multivariée, en ajustant les données pour tenir compte des facteurs de confusion, notamment de l'intervention. Une analyse exploratoire des anesthésiques sans opioïdes a également été réalisée. RéSULTATS: Au total 3733 cas ont été inclus, et l'âge moyen des enfants était de 8,3 ans. Après ajustement, il n'y avait pas de différences significatives entre les quartiles inférieur et supérieur pour le premier score de douleur chez l'enfant conscient·e, le score de douleur moyen, la dose d'opioïdes en salle de réveil ou la durée du séjour en salle de réveil; de plus, les différences estimées étaient faibles. On a estimé que les patient·es des quartiles supérieurs étaient plus susceptibles de recevoir des antiémétiques et ce, de manière significative pour ceux et celles du deuxième quartile. Les patient·es du quartile inférieur ont reçu significativement plus d'analgésiques non opioïdes peropératoires. Dans l'analyse exploratoire, aucune différence significative dans les scores de douleur en salle de réveil n'a été trouvée dans les cas sans opioïdes peropératoires. CONCLUSION: Les enfants qui ont reçu des doses plus faibles d'opioïdes peropératoires n'ont pas eu de pires issues de douleur en salle de réveil, mais ont eu besoin de moins d'antiémétiques et ont reçu un plus grand nombre d'analgésiques non opioïdes en peropératoire. Ces résultats suggèrent que des doses plus faibles d'opioïdes peropératoires peuvent être administrées aux enfants tant que d'autres analgésiques sont utilisés.

Nonopioid Versus Opioid Analgesics After Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether nonopioid analgesic regimens, taken after discharge for thyroid and parathyroid surgery have noninferior pain outcomes in comparison to opioid analgesic regimens. Secondarily, we sought to determine if nonopioid analgesic regimens decrease the number of opioid medications taken after thyroid and parathyroid surgery, and to assess adverse events associated with opioid versus nonopioid regimens. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane. REVIEW METHODS: A comprehensive search of the literature was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines, and identified 1299 nonduplicate articles for initial review of which 2 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified as meeting all eligibility criteria. Meta-analysis was not conducted due to heterogeneity in the data and statistical analyses. RESULTS: Both RCTs included in this systematic review found no significant differences in postoperative pain scores between individuals discharged with a nonopioid only analgesic regimen compared to analgesic regimen that included oral opioid medications. One study reported significantly increased number of postoperative calls related specifically to pain in the nonopioid arm compared to the opioid arm (15.6% vs. 3.2%, P = .045). CONCLUSION: This systematic review of RCTs revealed a limited number of studies examining nonopioid versus opioid postoperative pain medications among adults who undergo thyroid and parathyroid surgery. Among the 2 RCTs on this topic, there is a shared finding that nonopioid analgesic regimens are noninferior to opioid analgesic regimens in managing postoperative pain after thyroid and parathyroid surgery, supporting the use of nonopioid pain regimens given the risk of opioid dependence associated with prescription opioid medications.

The Opioid Analgesic Reduction Study (OARS) Pilot: A Double-Blind Randomized Multicenter Trial.

BACKGROUND: With addiction rates and opioid deaths increasing, health care providers are obligated to help stem the opioid crisis. As limited studies examine the comparative effectiveness of fixed-dose combination nonopioid analgesia to opioid-containing analgesia, a comparative effectiveness study was planned and refined by conducting a pilot study. METHODS: The Opioid Analgesic Reduction Study (OARS) pilot, a stratified, randomized, multisite, double-blind clinical trial, was designed to test technology and procedures to be used in the full OARS trial. Participants engaged in the full protocol, enabling the collection of OARS outcome data. Eligible participants reporting to 1 of 5 sites for partial or full bony impacted mandibular third molar extraction were stratified by biologic sex and randomized to 1 of 2 treatment groups, OPIOID or NONOPIOID. OPIOID participants were provided 20 doses of hydrocodone 5 mg/acetaminophen 300 mg. NONOPIOID participants were provided 20 doses of ibuprofen 400 mg/acetaminophen 500 mg. OARS outcomes data, including pain experience, adverse effects, sleep quality, pain interference, overall satisfaction, and remaining opioid tablets available for diversion, were collected via surveys, electronic medication bottles, eDiary, and activity/sleep monitor. RESULTS: Fifty-three participants were randomized with 50 completing the OARS pilot protocol. Across all outcome pain domains, in all but 1 time period, NONOPIOID was better in managing pain than OPIOID (P < 0.05 level). Other outcomes suggest less pain interference, less adverse events, better sleep quality, better overall satisfaction, and fewer opioid-containing tablets available for diversion. DISCUSSION: Results suggest patients requiring impacted mandibular third molar extraction would benefit from fixed-dose combination nonopioid analgesia. KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER STATEMENT: Study results suggest fixed-dose nonopioid combination ibuprofen 400 mg/acetaminophen 500 mg is superior to opioid-containing analgesic (hydrocodone 5 mg/acetaminophen 500 mg). This knowledge should inform surgeons and patients in the selection of postsurgical analgesia.

Trends in Racial Inequalities in the Administration of Opioid and Non-opioid Pain Medication in US Emergency Departments Across 1999-2020.

BACKGROUND: Despite initiatives to eradicate racial inequalities in pain treatment, there is no clear picture on whether this has translated to changes in clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether racial disparities in the receipt of pain medication in the emergency department have diminished over a 22-year period from 1999 to 2020. DESIGN: We used data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, an annual, cross-sectional probability sample of visits to emergency departments of non-federal general and short-stay hospitals in the USA. PATIENTS: Pain-related visits to the ED by Black or White patients. MAIN MEASURES: Prescriptions for opioid and non-opioid analgesics. KEY RESULTS: A total of 203,854 of all sampled 625,433 ED visits (35%) by Black or White patients were pain-related, translating to a population-weighted estimate of over 42 million actual visits to US emergency departments for pain annually across 1999-2020. Relative risk regression found visits by White patients were 1.26 (95% CI, 1.22-1.30; p<0.001) times more likely to result in an opioid prescription for pain compared to Black patients (40% vs. 32%). Visits by Black patients were also 1.25 (95% CI, 1.21-1.30; p<0.001) times more likely to result in non-opioid analgesics only being prescribed. Results were not substantively altered after adjusting for insurance status, type and severity of pain, geographical region, and other potential confounders. Spline regression found no evidence of meaningful change in the magnitude of racial disparities in prescribed pain medication over 22 years. CONCLUSIONS: Initiatives to create equitable healthcare do not appear to have resulted in meaningful alleviation of racial disparities in pain treatment in the emergency department.

Opioid Analgesia Compared with Non-Opioid Analgesia After Operative Treatment for Pediatric Supracondylar Humeral Fractures: Results from a Prospective Multicenter Trial.

BACKGROUND: Minimal pain and opioid use after operative treatment for pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures have been previously described; however, opioid-prescribing practices in the United States remain variable. We hypothesized that children without an opioid prescription would report similar postoperative pain compared with children prescribed opioids following closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP) of supracondylar humeral fractures. METHODS: Children who were 3 to 12 years of age and were undergoing CRPP for a closed supracondylar humeral fracture were prospectively enrolled in a multicenter, comparative study. Following a standardized dosing protocol, oxycodone, ibuprofen, and acetaminophen were prescribed at 2 hospitals (opioid cohort), and 2 other hospitals prescribed ibuprofen and acetaminophen alone (non-opioid cohort). The children's medication use and the daily pain that they experienced (scored on the Wong-Baker FACES Scale) were recorded at postoperative days 1 to 7, 10, 14, and 21, using validated text-message protocols. Based on an a priori power analysis, at least 64 evaluable subjects were recruited per cohort. RESULTS: A total of 157 patients were evaluated (81 [52%] in the opioid cohort and 76 [48%] in the non-opioid cohort). The median age at the time of the surgical procedure was 6.2 years, and 50% of the subjects were male. The mean postoperative pain scores were low overall (<4 of 10), and there were no significant differences in pain ratings between cohorts at any time point. No patient demographic or injury characteristics were correlated with increased pain or medication use. Notably, of the 81 patients in the opioid cohort, 28 (35%) took no oxycodone and 40 (49%) took 1 to 3 total doses across the postoperative period. Patients rarely took opioids after postoperative day 2. A single patient in the non-opioid cohort (1 [1%] of 76) received a rescue prescription of opioids after presenting to the emergency department with postoperative cast discomfort. CONCLUSIONS: Non-opioid analgesia following CRPP for pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures was equally effective as opioid analgesia. When oxycodone was prescribed, 84% of children took 0 to 3 total doses, and opioid use fell precipitously after postoperative day 2. To improve opioid stewardship, providers and institutions can consider discontinuing the routine prescription of opioids following this procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level II . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Effectiveness of Intravenous Non-Opioid Analgesics for Postoperative Pain Management of in Patients Undergoing Hip Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background and Objectives: Intravenous (IV) non-opioid analgesics (NOAs) have been extensively investigated as a multimodal analgesic strategy for the management of acute pain after hip surgery. This pair-wise meta-analysis examined IV NOA effects following hip surgery. Materials and Methods: A systematic search of the MEDLINE (PUBMED), Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was performed for studies investigating the effect of IV NOA for postoperative pain management following hip surgery up to 7 June 2023. We compared in-admission opioid use, postoperative VAS (visual analogue scale) score, hospital stay duration, and opioid-related adverse events between IV NOA and control groups. Results: Seven studies were included with a total of 953 patients who underwent hip surgery. Of these, 478 underwent IV NOA treatment, and 475 did not. The IV NOA groups had lower opioid use within 24-h following hip surgery (SMD, -0.48; 95% CI, -0.66 to -0.30; p < 0.01), lower VAS score (SMD, -0.47; 95% CI, -0.79 to -0.16; p < 0.01), shorter hospital stay (SMD, -0.28; 95% CI, -0.44 to -0.12; p < 0.01), and lower incidence of nausea and vomiting (OR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.67; p < 0.01) compared with the control groups. Conclusions: This meta-analysis demonstrated that IV NOA administration following hip surgery may have more favorable postoperative outcomes than those in control groups.

Application of analgesics in emergency services in Germany: a survey of the medical directors.

ABSTRAC: BACKGROUND: Treatment of acute pain is an essential element of pre-hospital care for injured and critically ill patients. Clinical studies indicate the need for improvement in the prehospital analgesia. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to assess the current situation in out of hospital pain management in Germany regarding the substances, indications, dosage and the delegation of the use of analgesics to emergency medical service (EMS) staff. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A standardized survey of the medical directors of the emergency services (MDES) in Germany was carried out using an online questionnaire. The anonymous results were evaluated using the statistical software SPSS (Chi-squared test, Mann-Whitney-U test). RESULTS: Seventy-seven MDES responsible for 989 rescue stations and 397 EMS- physician bases in 15 federal states took part in this survey. Morphine (98.7%), Fentanyl (85.7%), Piritramide (61%), Sufentanil (18.2%) and Nalbuphine (14,3%) are provided as opioid analgesics. The non-opioid analgesics (NOA) including Ketamine/Esketamine (98,7%), Metamizole (88.3%), Paracetamol (66,2%), Ibuprofen (24,7%) and COX-2-inhibitors (7,8%) are most commonly available. The antispasmodic Butylscopolamine is available (81,8%) to most rescue stations. Fentanyl is the most commonly provided opioid analgesic for treatment of a traumatic pain (70.1%) and back pain (46.8%), Morphine for visceral colic-like (33.8%) and non-colic pain (53.2%). In cases of acute coronary syndrome is Morphine (85.7%) the leading analgesic substance. Among the non-opioid analgesics is Ketamine/Esketamine (90.9%) most frequently provided to treat traumatic pain, Metamizole for visceral colic-like (70.1%) and non-colic (68.6%) as well as back pain (41.6%). Butylscopolamine is the second most frequently provided medication after Metamizole for "visceral colic-like pain" (55.8%). EMS staff (with or without a request for presence of the EMS physician on site) are permitted to use the following: Morphine (16.9%), Piritramide (13.0%) and Nalbuphine (10.4%), and of NOAs for (Es)Ketamine (74.1%), Paracetamol (53.3%) and Metamizole (35.1%). The dosages of the most important and commonly provided analgesic substances permitted to independent treatment by the paramedics are often below the recommended range for adults (RDE). The majority of medical directors (78.4%) of the emergency services consider the independent application of analgesics by paramedics sensible. The reason for the relatively rare authorization of opioids for use by paramedics is mainly due to legal (in)certainty (53.2%). CONCLUSION: Effective analgesics are available for EMS staff in Germany, the approach to improvement lies in the area of application. For this purpose, the adaptations of the legal framework as well as the creation of a guideline for prehospital analgesia are useful.

Intravenous acetaminophen reduces the length of intubation and rescue analgesics in intensive care unit patients after cardiovascular surgery in Japan: A retrospective analysis.

OBJECTIVE: After cardiovascular surgery, analgesic and sedative management in the intensive care unit (ICU) significantly affects short- and long-term outcomes of patients. This study aimed to clarify the impact of opioid reduction after acetaminophen administration on the length of intubation and rescue analgesic use after cardiovascular surgery. DESIGN: This was a case-control study. SETTING: This study was conducted in the ICU of a cardiovascular hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Datasets of 556 post-cardiac surgery participants were collected; for final analyses, 266 participants were selected by propensity score matching. Equality between the intervention and comparison groups was ensured by calculating the standardized difference and difference test. INTERVENTIONS: The intervention group was treated with the multimodal analgesic sedation protocol. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The primary outcomes were the length of intubation and use of rescue analgesics. RESULTS: The intervention group demonstrated a decreased total opioid consumption (460.0 vs 580.0 mcg, effect size [ES] = -0.178), opioid administration time (1,130.0 vs 2,070.0 minutes, ES = -0.306), and sedative administration time (955.0 vs 1,577.0 minutes, ES = -0.354). Moreover, the protocol resulted in decreased duration of ventilation (990.0 vs 1,057.5 minutes, ES = -0.140) and reduced need for rescue analgesics, including flurbiprofen axetil (3.5 vs 34.5 percent, ES = -0.392) and loxoprofen sodium (19.5 vs 48.1 percent, ES = -0.284). CONCLUSION: This study suggested that acetaminophen reduces opioid use and improves patient outcomes after cardiovascular surgery. Moreover, this research provides essential information for developing analgesic management strategies to reduce opioid consumption in patients after cardiovascular surgery.

Changes in hospital consumption of opioid and non-opioid analgesics after colorectal endometriosis surgery.

The aim of this study was to analyze postoperative consumption of analgesics during hospitalization following colorectal surgery for endometriosis. We conducted a retrospective study at Tenon University Hospital, Paris, France from February 2019 to December 2021. One hundred sixty-two patients underwent colorectal surgery: eighty-nine (55%) by robotic and seventy-three (45%) by conventional laparoscopy. The type of procedure had an impact on acetaminophen and nefopam consumed per day: consumption for colorectal shaving, discoid resection, and segmental resection was, respectively, 2(0.5), 2.1(0.6), 2.4(0.6) g/day (p = 10-3), and 25(7), 30(14), 31(11) mg/day (p = 0.03). The total amount of tramadol consumed was greater following robotic surgery compared with conventional laparoscopy (322(222) mg vs 242(292) mg, p = 0.04). We observed a switch in analgesic consumption over the years: tramadol was used by 70% of patients in 2019 but only by 7.1% in 2021 (p < 10-3); conversely, ketoprofen was not used in 2019, but was consumed by 57% of patients in 2021 (p < 10-3). A history of abdominal surgery (OR = 0.37 (0.16-0.78, p = 0.011) and having surgery in 2020 rather than in 2019 (OR = 0.10 (0.04-0.24, p < 10-3)) and in 2021 than in 2019 (OR = 0.08 (0.03-0.20, p < 10-3)) were the only variables independently associated with the risk of opioid use. We found that neither clinical characteristics nor intraoperative findings had an impact on opioid consumption in this setting, and that it was possible to rapidly modify in-hospital analgesic consumption modalities by significantly reducing opioid consumption in favor of NSAIDS or nefopam.

Efficacy of nonopioid analgesics and regional techniques for perioperative pain management in laparoscopic gynecological surgery: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The optimal approach for perioperative pain management in laparoscopic gynecological surgery is unclear due to a lack of comprehensive analysis, which limits the development of evidence-based enhanced recovery after surgery protocols. This study aimed to conduct a systematic review and network meta-analysis to support clinical decision-making for optimal analgesia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study conducted a systematic literature search in PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and CINAHL from inception to 3 December 2021, and updated on 19 August 2022. Randomized controlled trials comparing the perioperative use of nonopioid analgesics and regional techniques in adults undergoing elective laparoscopic gynecological surgery under general anesthesia were included in the analysis, either alone or in combination. The co-analgesic interventions during the perioperative period for the intervention and control groups of each eligible study were also considered. We assessed the risk of bias using the Risk of Bias 2 tool and evaluated the certainty of evidence using the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA) approach. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was used to estimate the efficacy of the analgesic strategies. The primary outcomes were pain score at rest and cumulative oral morphine milligram equivalents at 24 h postoperatively. RESULTS: Overall, 108 studies with 9582 participants and 35 different interventions were included. Compared with inert treatments, combinations of two or more interventions showed better efficacy and longer duration in reducing postoperative pain and opioid consumption within 24 h than monotherapies, and showed stepwise enhanced effects with increasing analgesic modes. In combination therapies, regional techniques that included peripheral nerve blocks and intraperitoneal local anesthetics, in combination with nonopioid systemic analgesics, or combining local anesthetics with adjuvant drugs, were found to be more effective. Monotherapies were found to be mostly ineffective. The most effective peripheral nerve blocks were found to be ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block with adjuvant and ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide robust evidence for the routine use of regional techniques in combination with nonopioid analgesics in perioperative pain management. However, further better quality and larger trials are needed, considering the low confidence levels for certain interventions.

Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Block for Postoperative Pain Management after Open Oncologic Abdominal Surgery.

Patients undergoing abdominal oncologic surgical procedures require particular surgical and anesthesiologic considerations. Traditional pain management, such as opiate treatment, continuous epidural analgesia, and non-opioid drugs, may have serious side effects in this patient population. We evaluated erector spinae plane (ESP) blocks for postoperative pain management following elective oncologic abdominal surgeries. In this single-center, prospective, and randomized study, we recruited 100 patients who underwent elective oncological abdominal surgery between December 2020 and January 2022 at Soroka University Medical Center in Beer Sheva, Israel. We compared postoperative pain levels in patients who were treated with a preincisional ESP block in addition to traditional pain management with intravenous opioids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and acetaminophen, compared to patients who were only given traditional pain management (control). Patients who were treated with a preincisional ESP block demonstrated significantly lower Visual Analog Scale scores at 60 minutes and 4, 8, and 12 hours following the surgery, compared to the control group (p < 0.001). Accordingly, patients in the ESP group required less morphine from 60 minutes to 12 hours after surgery, but they required increased non-opioid postoperative analgesia management at 4, 8, and 12 hours after surgery (p from 0.002 to <0.001) compared to the control group. In this study, we found ESP blocks to be a safe, technically simple, and effective treatment for postoperative pain management after elective oncologic abdominal procedures.